Ask Question
4 October, 19:57

Use of pesticides in agriculture is like nuclear power: nobody loves it, but climate change has made it an important option. On the other hand, many believe that efforts and money should be directed into a solution other than different pesticides. Which action would be most likely to limit scientific research on safe pesticides for food? A. People voting not to allow government money to fund research on safe pesticides B. Governments removing restrictions on research on safe pesticides C. Scientific communities providing evidence supporting use of safe pesticides D. People who decide to give more money to study safe pesticides

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 4 October, 20:09
    0
    Hello there.

    Use of pesticides in agriculture is like nuclear power: nobody loves it, but climate change has made it an important option. On the other hand, many believe that efforts and money should be directed into a solution other than different pesticides. Which action would be most likely to limit scientific research on safe pesticides for food? A. People voting not to allow government money to fund research on safe pesticides B. Governments removing restrictions on research on safe pesticides C. Scientific communities providing evidence supporting use of safe pesticides D. People who decide to give more money to study safe pesticides

    D. People who decide to give more money to study safe pesticides
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Use of pesticides in agriculture is like nuclear power: nobody loves it, but climate change has made it an important option. On the other ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers