Ask Question
30 May, 04:29

Explain why the scenario below fails to address the protection that patent laws offer inventors.

Situation: Raymond is an inventor and he has copied a product that he knows is patented.

Raymond: "This product is going to sell very well, and I am not concerned about getting caught. The worst that will happen is that I will pay a fine."

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 30 May, 04:46
    0
    The punishment given to copy the brain is very negligible.

    Explanation:

    The rule should be in such a manner that,

    It does not punish the person who has not involved in the act of crime Punishment should be in a manner that, it gives an opportunity for the criminal to correct himself.

    Scenario explained:

    Based on this idea, for this scenario, I feel like using the product of someone which is patented is crime but the punishment given for copying the product of someone is negligible. So anyone can try to copy, just pay fine if they are caught. So this neither satisfies rule number 1 mentioned above, nor satisfies rule number 2.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Explain why the scenario below fails to address the protection that patent laws offer inventors. Situation: Raymond is an inventor and he ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers