Ask Question
19 July, 00:22

When justice fortas refers to keyishan v. board of regents in the majority opinion for tinker vs des moines, what kind of reasoning is he using to support his argument

A. Pathos

B. Judicial Review

C. Predecent

D. Straw man

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 19 July, 00:36
    0
    The correct option is C: Precedent

    When Justice Fortas referred to Keyishian v. Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, he used a precent reasoning in order to support his argument as he was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

    The precedent is a kind of reasoning that is used to justify the decision of a court that has a special legal significance.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “When justice fortas refers to keyishan v. board of regents in the majority opinion for tinker vs des moines, what kind of reasoning is he ...” in 📗 English if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers