Ask Question
19 January, 10:02

Why do you think courts of appeals generally limit their review of cases to questions of the law rather than to matters of fact

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 19 January, 10:07
    0
    Because the facts were dealt with at the trial.

    You were convicted there.

    The appeals process is to see if matters of law were violated in your case.

    That is why you must have "grounds for appeal" for your appeal to move forward.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why do you think courts of appeals generally limit their review of cases to questions of the law rather than to matters of fact ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers