Ask Question
18 September, 23:11

In overturning its betts ruling what did the court in effect say about its judgment in that case?

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 18 September, 23:30
    0
    It was unconstitutional--they overturned the Betts decision because they stated it violated the 14th Amendment requiring due process.

    The Betts decision stated a federal crime did not require a person have an attorney. However, the case of Gideon v. Wainwright overturned the original decision. They stated in all court cases a person has the right to an attorney.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In overturning its betts ruling what did the court in effect say about its judgment in that case? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers