Ask Question
21 June, 08:43

How does organizing the past by period differ from organizing the past by theme

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 21 June, 08:49
    0
    Answer choices are:

    a. A historian who organizes the past by region focuses on a specific start and end date, whereas a historian who organizes the past by period focuses on the most influential individuals.

    b. A historian who organizes the past by region focuses on a big idea that occurs across history, whereas a historian who organizes the past by period focuses on a specific area of the world.

    Correct answer choice is:

    A. A historian who organizes the past by region focuses on a specific start and end date, whereas a historian who organizes the past by period focuses on the most influential individuals.

    Explanation:

    This whole process is thus a method or study of classifying the past into separate, quantified named blocks of your time so as to encourage the study and evaluation of history. This ends up in an illustrative hypothesis that offers appropriate terms for periods of your time with comparatively substantial attributes. However, deciding the precise starting and ending of any "period" is commonly impulsive. It's modified over time in history.

    To the extent that history is continuous and inapplicable, all systems of periodization are additional or less impulsive. However without named periods, but clumsy or inaccurate, the diversion would be nothing but dispersed events without a structure to assist people to perceive them.
  2. 21 June, 09:06
    0
    O rganizing the past by period would be in chronological order. O rganizing the past by theme would most likely be in order of importance.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “How does organizing the past by period differ from organizing the past by theme ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers