Ask Question
7 September, 11:10

Which of the following BEST illustrates the process of the Supreme Court's review of a case? A. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written B. lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> a writ of certiorari is granted >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote >> opinions are written C. opinions are written >> a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote D. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers on both sides prepare briefs and present oral arguments >> opinions are written >> justices hold a conference to form a majority vote

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 7 September, 11:23
    0
    C

    Explanation:

    I choose C as my answer because the answer in A was wrong, a writ is the option after written opinions. B was also wrong because lawyers preparing briefs and presenting need to plan before doing that and to make sure the Supreme Court understands the situation. D is also wrong because it starts just like A.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which of the following BEST illustrates the process of the Supreme Court's review of a case? A. a writ of certiorari is granted >> lawyers ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers