Ask Question
19 February, 01:09

Supreme Court Cases

What was the significance of Supreme Court's ruling in In re Gault?

A. It was ruled that minors could be tried as adults if they were charged with a violent crime

B.

It was determined that minors are entitled to constitutional protections

C.

It was determined that minors should not be required to have parents present during interrogations

D. It was ruled that minors should only be tried as adults if the charges against them are violent

Reset

Submit

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 19 February, 01:17
    0
    Right choice is:

    B. It was determined that minors are entitled to constitutional protections

    Explanation:

    In the In Re Gault case, the Supreme Court said that juvenile defendants must enjoy the same rights to a due process just as in the case of adults.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Supreme Court Cases What was the significance of Supreme Court's ruling in In re Gault? A. It was ruled that minors could be tried as ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers