In deciding cases involving laws against sedition, the Supreme Court has

a. established the excessive entanglement standard.

b. upheld the Alien and Sedition acts of 1798.

c. upheld the constitutionality of all such laws.

d. developed the "clear and present danger" rule.

Question

Soren Curry

History

25 April, 08:34

In deciding cases involving laws against sedition, the Supreme Court has

a. established the excessive entanglement standard.

b. upheld the Alien and Sedition acts of 1798.

c. upheld the constitutionality of all such laws.

d. developed the "clear and present danger" rule.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Hamza Branch · Answer 1

In deciding cases involving laws against sedition, the Supreme Court has " c. upheld the constitutionality of all such laws," since only in very rare circumstances can the freedom of speech and press be inhibited.

In deciding cases involving laws against sedition, the Supreme Court hasa. established the excessive entanglement standard.b. upheld the Alien and Sedition acts of 1798.c. upheld the constitutionality of all such laws.d. developed the "clear and present danger" rule.

In deciding cases involving laws against sedition, the Supreme Court has

a. established the excessive entanglement standard.

b. upheld the Alien and Sedition acts of 1798.

c. upheld the constitutionality of all such laws.

d. developed the "clear and present danger" rule.