Ask Question
11 January, 16:07

Prove that a relation that is reflexive and symmetric need not also be transitive.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 11 January, 16:21
    0
    We give a counterexample:

    Let R={ (a, a), (a, b), (b, a), (b, b), (c, c), (b, c), (c, b) } be a relation.

    It is reflexive as it contains (a, a), (b, b) and (c, c).

    It is symmetric as (a, b) and (b, a) are both in R; (b, c) and (c, b) are both in R.

    But it is not transitive, as (a, b) and (b, c) are in R, but (a, c) is not.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Prove that a relation that is reflexive and symmetric need not also be transitive. ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers