Ansel has been asked to analyze the benefits and feasibility of implementing a stress-reduction program on a fixed budget. Through research, Ansel learns that the cost of a stress reduction program exceeds the proposed budget. He also learns that such programs are linked to increased employee health and morale. Based on this information, he advises company leadership that the program should be implemented immediately. Ansel is guilty of?

Question

Mackenzie Vaughan

Social Studies

19 January, 21:17

Ansel has been asked to analyze the benefits and feasibility of implementing a stress-reduction program on a fixed budget. Through research, Ansel learns that the cost of a stress reduction program exceeds the proposed budget. He also learns that such programs are linked to increased employee health and morale. Based on this information, he advises company leadership that the program should be implemented immediately. Ansel is guilty of?

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Lukas Lester · Answer 1

Answer:slanting the facts

Explanation:

Slanting the facts means you take the skew description of something in order to focus on one aspect of it or favour the other aspects of it.

Ansel researched the stress reduction program and found that it exceeds the proposed budget but she still suggests that it get implemented probably because she is focusing on one advantage that she found which suggest that this program will increase customers health and morale.

So he is distorting or slanting the fact that it will exceed the budget irrespective of the fact that it will benefit the employees but it will cost more than the company has planned to spend.