Ginger owns a business that is comprehensively regulated by a federal agency. One day, a federal inspector arrives at Ginger's business without advance warning and begins to conduct a search, taking several samples of some products Ginger is manufacturing. Ginger claims this is a violation of her constitutional rights. How would a court likely rule?

Question

Riya Rasmussen

Social Studies

11 November, 23:19

Ginger owns a business that is comprehensively regulated by a federal agency. One day, a federal inspector arrives at Ginger's business without advance warning and begins to conduct a search, taking several samples of some products Ginger is manufacturing. Ginger claims this is a violation of her constitutional rights. How would a court likely rule?

+3

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Vaughn Glass · Answer 1

Because the business is comprehensively regulated, a court will assume that Ginger knows that her business is subject to periodic, unannounced inspections.

Explanation:

Ginger's company is regulated by a federal agency, that is, a government-owned agency. Accordingly, the federal agency has every right to obtain information about Ginger's company and all transactions and documents circulating to Ginger at any time. For this reason, we can say that because the business is comprehensively regulated, a court will assume that Ginger knows that its business is subject to periodic and unannounced inspections.

Devan Cox · Answer 2

Because the business is comprehensively regulated, a court will assume that Ginger knows that her business is subject to periodic, unannounced inspections.