What did the court rule in regard to the plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress in Olson v. CenturyLink, the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that representatives of the defendant, a provider of telephone services, wrongly failed to process his application, disconnected his telephone service, and hung up on him during telephone conversations?

Question

Jorge

Social Studies

13 January, 03:50

What did the court rule in regard to the plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress in Olson v. CenturyLink, the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that representatives of the defendant, a provider of telephone services, wrongly failed to process his application, disconnected his telephone service, and hung up on him during telephone conversations?

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Deangelo Rivera · Answer 1

That the conduct reported by the plaintiff did not meet the level of conduct required to find the intentional imposition of emotional distress

Explanation:

that answer explains the situation of the plaintiff