The criminal conduct was "unwanted touching" of the child's breast. The appeals court affirmed the sentence, holding that it was not "grossly disproportionate" to the crime. What are the relevant facts to consider when making such a determination? Is the dissent correct?
+1
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The criminal conduct was "unwanted touching" of the child's breast. The appeals court affirmed the sentence, holding that it was not ...” in 📗 Advanced Placement (AP) if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Home » Advanced Placement (AP) » The criminal conduct was "unwanted touching" of the child's breast. The appeals court affirmed the sentence, holding that it was not "grossly disproportionate" to the crime.