Ask Question
26 December, 16:49

Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental change because it happened so quickly. Which is the best analysis of Paulo's position? He is correct; it happened in just a few seconds. He is correct; it did not cause any long-term changes. He is incorrect; it caused long-term changes. He is incorrect; impacts are not environmental changes.

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 26 December, 16:54
    0
    D: He is incorrect, the impact caused long term changes
  2. 26 December, 16:56
    0
    He is incorrect because there are long term changes such as dionsoaurs died of mailny from it some scitentist say but for quick I say its c.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers