Would an amphibian that lacks lungs and breathes entirely through its skin likely be larger or smaller than an amphibian that has lungs? A. Smaller because its larger surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone. B. Larger because its smaller surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone. C. Larger because its larger surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone. D. Smaller because its smaller surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone.

Question

22 September, 14:25

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jaydon Levy · Answer 1

Answer:. D. Smaller because its smaller surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone.