Biology

3 January, 13:47

When we talk about the history of science, we usually talk about individuals who contributed to scientific discoveries. Is this a good or bad way of thinking about science? What are some pros or cons?

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “When we talk about the history of science, we usually talk about individuals who contributed to scientific discoveries. Is this a good or ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

What would happen if mitosis occured, but cytokinesis did not?

Which is a coarse-grained, igneous rock composed mainly of pyroxene, plagioclase feldspar, and olivine?

What is the simplest way to memorise the phyla of the kingdoms and their characteristics

What is the definition of conduction

Is the deeply felt belief that mortals cannot escape pain and sorrow?

New Questions in Biology

Which of the following is a function of the nucleus? A) stores DNA B) stores sugars C) builds proteins D) packages proteins

Animals are motile because they have: a. energy b. metabolism c. nerve and muscle fibers d. legs or wings

Radiation generated by the big bang cooled and is now detectable as microwaves. t/f

What's an easy way to remember the definition of biome?

What causes lighting