Ask Question
30 June, 12:34

A man is on trial for the murder of his wife. The prosecution on this case would like to bring forward an expert in the field of ballistics to prove the bullet found at the crime scene was that of the defendant. This ballistics expert has a PhD in forensic science and has worked at the Ballistics Dept. at the Forensic Center in Houston, TX for 25 years. His methods are widely accepted in the scientific community. The judge finds his testimony to be relevant and allows his testimony to be heard. Which correctly describes the admissibility of this expert's testimony?

A) Frye standard

B) Daubert ruling

C) Miranda rights

D) Ballistics rule

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 30 June, 12:49
    0
    I would say b ballistic rule I thinks
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A man is on trial for the murder of his wife. The prosecution on this case would like to bring forward an expert in the field of ballistics ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers