Ask Question
21 February, 12:18

In response to peer review, a scientific journal might choose not to publish a paper submitted by a scientist. which of the following is a reason why a paper might be rejected for publication?

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 21 February, 12:28
    0
    Here are the choices for the given question above:

    A. The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.

    B. The accompanying photographs were not sensational enough.

    C. The opening sentence was incapable of capturing a reader's interest.

    D. The reported discovery had no potential commercial value.

    Well the answer is A. The experimental results failed to support the conclusion.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “In response to peer review, a scientific journal might choose not to publish a paper submitted by a scientist. which of the following is a ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers