Ask Question
21 June, 23:51

Which is more harmful primary or secondary pollutants

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 22 June, 00:02
    0
    Answer: Primary pollutants and secondary pollutants can be more dangerous.

    Explanation: The first are those that are emitted directly from a source, which can be natural (volcanic eruptions or fires, for example) or of anthropogenic origin (carbon monoxide from vehicles). Secondary pollutants, on the other hand, are not emitted directly.
  2. 22 June, 00:13
    0
    secondary pollutants

    Explanation:

    Primary pollutants and secondary pollutants can be more dangerous. The first are those that are emitted directly from a source, which can be natural (volcanic eruptions or fires, for example) or of anthropogenic origin (carbon monoxide from vehicles). Secondary pollutants, on the other hand, are not emitted directly
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which is more harmful primary or secondary pollutants ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers