Ask Question
10 August, 16:13

A state in the United States wanted some funds for protecting wildlife. However, the wildfire conservation and restoration program and the state wildlife grants program denied funds to state for the proposed program. The lack of which plan might be possible reason for the denial of funds?

-wildlife rehabilitation plan

- wildfire conservation plan

-wildlife action plan

-wildlife protection plan

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 10 August, 16:39
    0
    Option D, wildlife protection plan

    Explanation:

    The wildlife conservation fund are focused towards high quality and extent of wildlife restoration and protection. Wildlife protection plan is essential part of any proposed program in order to secure grants from wildfire conservation and restoration program and the state wildlife grants program. If any of these funding sources have denied funds for the proposed program, then it is sure that this program might be lacking attempts to conserve or protect the wildlife.

    Hence, option D is correct.
  2. 10 August, 16:42
    0
    Wildlife action plan is the answer
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A state in the United States wanted some funds for protecting wildlife. However, the wildfire conservation and restoration program and the ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers