Ask Question
17 December, 19:55

Why should/shouldn't Pluto be reclassified as a planet?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 17 December, 20:20
    0
    (This could be opinion based, but ok.)

    Explanation:

    should:Pluto was known as a planet for 75 years. This means that most people already knew it as a planet, and would be extremely confused. All of the books about planets would be inaccurate and changed. Not all people can access brand new books, leading to inaccurate information.

    shouldn't: The same reason that it was unclassified as a planet. It does not adhere to all of the rules of being a planet. It is not completely round and does not have a round orbit around the sun. Pluto does not have every requirement to be a real planet, and therefor, it would be incorrect to have it classified wrongly.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why should/shouldn't Pluto be reclassified as a planet? ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers