Generally, it is the case that large animals are more vulnerable to habitat destruction than small animals; however the opposite can be true. Which explains why small animals might be more vulnerable to habitat destruction than large animals in certain situations? A. small animals often have smaller habitat range than larger animalsB. small animals often have more specialized requirements for living than larger animalsC. small animals are more likely to be eaten by larger animalsD. all of the aboveE. only the first and second choices

Question

Justin David

Biology

5 August, 04:39

Generally, it is the case that large animals are more vulnerable to habitat destruction than small animals; however the opposite can be true. Which explains why small animals might be more vulnerable to habitat destruction than large animals in certain situations? A. small animals often have smaller habitat range than larger animalsB. small animals often have more specialized requirements for living than larger animalsC. small animals are more likely to be eaten by larger animalsD. all of the aboveE. only the first and second choices

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Karli Cook · Answer 1

E. only the first and second choices

Explanation:

Small animals often have smaller habitat ranges than other larger animals.

This means they have fewer places where they can survive, needing some specific environmental conditions. More specific than some bigger animals.

Small animals often have more specialized requirements for living than larger animals.

Some little changes in temperature or weather can affect a lot to some small animals and can not affect bigger ones.