Keisha was reporting to her class about the benefits of caffeine. She stated that it heightened alertness. She also showed graphs of repeated trials. She got all of her information from an Internet site with an unknown source. Which best explains the quality of her claim? Her claim was weak because her sources were unreliable. Her claim was strong because she used graphs. Her claim was biased since she probably likes caffeine. Her claim was not thorough enough.

Question

Gerardo Mata

Biology

21 August, 16:50

Keisha was reporting to her class about the benefits of caffeine. She stated that it heightened alertness. She also showed graphs of repeated trials. She got all of her information from an Internet site with an unknown source. Which best explains the quality of her claim? Her claim was weak because her sources were unreliable. Her claim was strong because she used graphs. Her claim was biased since she probably likes caffeine. Her claim was not thorough enough.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Sharon Baker · Answer 1

The quality of hr claim is not only weak because of she uses an unreliable source, but it could also makes her look bias because she does not acknowledge the other side which makes her claim not thorough enough to be valid.