Ask Question
9 June, 02:46

If you wanted to show the 3-dimensional shape of a protein, including all of the atoms composing it, you should use

a. 2. if you wanted to show the general shape of a protein, along with some important functional details such as folds and coils, you should use

a. 3. if you wanted to show the 3-dimensional shape of a protein, including the backbone structure, folds, and coils, you should use

a. 4. if you wanted to show a generalized protein in which the focus is on the protein's function rather than its structure, you should use

a. 5. if you wanted to show the 3-dimensional shape of a protein by showing the amino acid side chains and their interactions, you should use

a.

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 9 June, 02:49
    0
    If you wanted to show the 3-dimensional shape of a protein, including all of the atoms composing it, you should use a space-filling model.

    2. If you wanted to show the general shape of a protein, along with some important functional details such as folds and coils, you should use a simplified diagram.

    3. If you wanted to show the 3-dimensional shape of a protein, including the backbone structure, folds, and coils, you should use a ribbon model.

    4. If you wanted to show a generalized protein in which the focus is on the protein's function rather than its structure, you should use a simple shape.

    5. If you wanted to show the 3-dimensional shape of a protein by showing the amino acid side chains and their interactions, you should use a wireframe model.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “If you wanted to show the 3-dimensional shape of a protein, including all of the atoms composing it, you should use a. 2. if you wanted to ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers