Biology

19 May, 22:38

Which of these is an argument against the use of carbon dioxide

sequestration technologies?

O A. The environment cannot naturally remove carbon dioxide fast

enough.

O B. Trapping carbon dioxide produces a net reduction in greenhouse

gas emissions.

O C. There are few risks associated with trapping carbon dioxide.

D. Current technologies are expensive and potentially dangerous.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Not Sure About the Answer?

Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which of these is an argument against the use of carbon dioxide sequestration technologies? O A. The environment cannot naturally remove ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.

Search for Other Answers

You Might be Interested in

What do primary consumers eat

Scientists think that introns?

What carries instructions for making proteins from the nucleus into the cytoplasm?

The process of maintaining internal stability is a central concept of human physiology and is called? User: The prediction of the outcome of a disease is called?

Which type of ecosystem or biome would likely have the highest net primary productivity?

New Questions in Biology

Which term means a red blood cell? Erythrocyte leukocyte microcyte phagocyte?

What is meant by the amino acid sequence of a protein?

What happens to the water that is left behind after evaporation?

Without enzymes, what would happen to the rate of chemical reactions?

People who get angry easily tend to have more heart disease. that's the conclusion of a study that followed a random sample of 12,986 people from three locations for about four years.