Scientists from different fields are trying to understand how the global climate is reacting to the changes caused in nature, and by human activities. They have come up with conflicting interpretations. Which of these is the most likely outcome of differences in interpretations made by scientists on the issue of global climate?
All old ideas would be discarded.
Scientific evidence would be weakened.
New ideas would be created and tested.
The limitations of science would be evident.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Scientists from different fields are trying to understand how the global climate is reacting to the changes caused in nature, and by human ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What was the major contributor of oxygen to earth's early atmosphere?
Answers (2)
What happens when atoms do ionic bonding?
Answers (2)
What happens if you place human red blood cells in a concentrated salt solution a. They shrink as water moves from inside to outside the cells as a result of osmosis b.
Answers (1)
In the six-kingdom system of classification, protists compose a single kingdom. Describe an alternate view of this classification.
Answers (1)
You live on the east (leeward) side of the Sierra Nevada mountains. What kind of climate should you expect?
Answers (2)
New Questions in Biology
When you get a minor cut platelets in your blood stick to the wound and cause?
Answers (1)
Why are phospholipids ideal for making up the selectively permeable membrane?
Answers (1)
5. What type of bond can be found between complementary nitrogenous bases?
Answers (1)
Which field of biology focuses on heredity and dna?
Answers (1)
What property of water was demonstrated by fold and float
Answers (1)