Ask Question
26 August, 05:18

To drill or not to drill? That is the big question as Americans face climbing gas prices. A group of research scientists employed by Mobil Oil conducted a study on the feasibility of drilling for oil off the coast of California. They researched the impact of oil drilling on near-by ecosystems and investigated the likelihood of future oil spills. According to their data, coastal California would be an excellent location to drill for oil.

Based on standard scientific method protocol, what should these scientists have done before reporting their findings?

A) An unbiased research team should review their methods, data, and conclusions.

B) They should collaborate with the executives from Mobil Oil on a research plan.

C) They should share their data with concerned California environmentalist groups.

D) The team should meet with local governments to get some feedb

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 26 August, 05:34
    0
    The answer is A: An unbiased research team should review their methods, data, and conclusions. This is much like a peer-review process before a study is published. This ensures that scientific errors in the methodology or interpretation of the results can be identified and corrected before results are presented to the public and government and policy decisions are made.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “To drill or not to drill? That is the big question as Americans face climbing gas prices. A group of research scientists employed by Mobil ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers