Ask Question
6 September, 08:11

The sustained massive use of pesticides in farming has two effects that are especially pernicious. First, it often kills off the pests' natural enemies in the area. Second, it often unintentionally gives rise to insecticide-resistant pests, since those insects that survive a particular insecticide will be the ones most resistant to it, and they are the ones left to breed.

From the passage above, it can be properly inferred that the effectiveness of the sustained massive use of pesticides can be extended by doing which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility?

(A) Using only chemically stable insecticides

(B) Periodically switching the type of insecticide used

(C) Gradually increasing the quantities of pesticides used

(D) Leaving a few fields fallow every year

(E) Breeding higher-yielding varieties of crop plants

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 6 September, 08:21
    0
    Option (B).

    Explanation:

    Pesticides may be defined as the chemicals that are used to kill the insects and pests. The excessive use of chemicals can cause soil and water pollution in the environment.

    The continuous use of insecticides and pesticides in the field makes the organism resistant towards that chemical. To overcome this problem, the switching of different insecticides periodically over time.

    Thus, the correct answer is option (B).
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The sustained massive use of pesticides in farming has two effects that are especially pernicious. First, it often kills off the pests' ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers