Ask Question
14 August, 16:59

Conclusions based on flawed data that does not answer a testable question is an example of ... A} an inference B) a scientific explanation C) pseudoscience D) science

+1
Answers (2)
  1. 14 August, 17:12
    0
    C is the correct answer and they put turbo building back so yeah

    Explanation: vault the mechs
  2. 14 August, 17:28
    0
    Option C, pseudoscience

    Explanation:

    When a fact has no logical or scientific backing to support its existence and is considered true only on the basis of beliefs prevailing in any society since ages. For example - spiritual science, horoscope, palm reading, tarot card, existence of God etc.

    Thus, any flawed data that cannot be tested comes under the category of pseudoscience.

    Hence, option C is correct
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Conclusions based on flawed data that does not answer a testable question is an example of ... A} an inference B) a scientific explanation ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers