In a winter of an epidemic flu, 2000 babies were surveyed by a well-known pharmaceutical company to determine if the company's new medicine was effective after two days. Among 120 babies who had the flu and were given the medicine, 29 were cured within two days. Among 280 babies who had the flu but were not given the medicine, 56 were cured within two days. Is there any significant indication that supports the company's claim of the effectiveness of the medicine?

Question

Twizzler

Biology

24 June, 12:51

In a winter of an epidemic flu, 2000 babies were surveyed by a well-known pharmaceutical company to determine if the company's new medicine was effective after two days. Among 120 babies who had the flu and were given the medicine, 29 were cured within two days. Among 280 babies who had the flu but were not given the medicine, 56 were cured within two days. Is there any significant indication that supports the company's claim of the effectiveness of the medicine?

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Moises Riley · Answer 1

Answer:there's actually no significant indication that the company's claim effectiveness.

Explanation: this is so because, about 24% of the former got cured while 20% of the latter got cured. This percentage range or difference is quite insignificant.