Ask Question
24 October, 21:55

The Truth About Antibacterial Soap

According to Discovery Fit & Health, about 75 percent of liquid soaps claim to be antibacterial. While this kind of soap sounds like a good idea, it is really not more effective than regular soap. Soap in general works by binding with dirt and grime and bacteria. This binding action allows the particles to be washed away easily. Antibacterial soap really does no more than regular soap. In fact, to be more effective than regular soap, antibacterial soap should stay on your skin for about two minutes to do what it claims it can do. Most people do not wash their hands that long. In addition, antibacterial soap may do harm. First it kills both beneficial and harmful bacteria. Second, scientists believe bacteria may become resistant to antibacterial agents over time, especially if they are not used correctly. Finally, antibacterial soap does nothing to viruses. Most of the time, we get sick from viruses, not bacteria. In sum, antibacterial

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 24 October, 22:18
    0
    There is a part of the question missing:

    soap does not live up to the hype. You are better off just using regular soap.

    How is "The Truth About Antibacterial Soap" organized?

    Fact by fact

    Cause and effect

    Chronological order

    Problem-solution

    This article is organized in fact by fact manner.

    The author is giving us several facts, explained in detail one by one, about antibacterial soap to support their claim that antibacterial soap is ineffective and potentially harmful if overused.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The Truth About Antibacterial Soap According to Discovery Fit & Health, about 75 percent of liquid soaps claim to be antibacterial. ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers