Ask Question
11 November, 07:29

The shape of your utility function implies that you are (a risk-averse or risk-friendly) individual, and, therefore, you ((you would or would not) accept the wager because the difference in utility between B and C is (less than or greater than) the difference between C and A.

Which of the following best explain why the pain of losing $1,000 exceeds the pleasure of winning $1,000 for risk-averse people?

a. The more wealth that risk-averse people have, the less satisfaction they receive from an additional dollar.

b. The utility function of a risk-averse person exhibits the law of diminishing marginal utility.

c. Risk-averse people overestimate the probability of losing money.

d. Risk-averse people are relatively poor and cannot afford to lose any money.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 11 November, 07:54
    0
    Answer:Defend or critique the following statement: "People who are unable to put aside their own interests should not be on teams."

    Explanation: I have no clue
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The shape of your utility function implies that you are (a risk-averse or risk-friendly) individual, and, therefore, you ((you would or ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers