Ask Question
20 October, 12:46

Would it have been better for Ms. Torti to argue that she was providing medical treatment and have the court deal with the issue of what constitutes medical care rather than the issue of immunity?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 20 October, 13:07
    0
    Answer: No, it would not be a better idea

    Explanation:

    If Ms. Torti argued that she was providing medical assistance, then the Law would protect Ms. Torti's immunity. But, had the questioned would have arose if Ms. Torti was medically trained or she was aware that it needs medically trained personnel to provide such care at a scene of emergency. This would be a direct attack on the defendant's cause. I do not think that it would have been a better idea.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Would it have been better for Ms. Torti to argue that she was providing medical treatment and have the court deal with the issue of what ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers