A military institute in a particular state launched a separate program for women. However, the senior members of the program held that women would not be provided with the same type of rigorous military training, facilities, courses, faculty, financial opportunities, and alumni connections that were provided to male cadets. The women cadets of the program filed a suit in order to get justice. Which approach is most likely to be adopted in this case?

Question

Larissa Hansen

Business

15 July, 02:00

A military institute in a particular state launched a separate program for women. However, the senior members of the program held that women would not be provided with the same type of rigorous military training, facilities, courses, faculty, financial opportunities, and alumni connections that were provided to male cadets. The women cadets of the program filed a suit in order to get justice. Which approach is most likely to be adopted in this case?

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Teagan · Answer 1

quasi-strict scrutiny approach

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the approach most likely to be adopted for this case is quasi-strict scrutiny approach. This refers to a statutory classification that deals with gender or legitimacy. Which is exactly what this is case is in regards to, as they are filling a suit on the basis that they are being treated differently based on their gender.