Dmitri has insurance with Hysterical Coverage Insurance Company, Inc. (Hysterica Coverage). Dmitri has a wreck with Susie. The adjuster for Hysterical Coverage orally agrees to pay Olya $1,000 for the damage to her car. The adjuster, however, gets in trouble with his boss for agreeing to pay too much. He tells Olya that he is backing out of the deal because the agreement is unenforceable on the basis that the statute of frauds requires that a contract to pay the debt of another be in writing. Discuss whether the adjuster is correct or not. In your discussion, you must discuss what constitutes primary versus secondary obligations and which of these obligations is within the Statute of Frauds

Question

Reagan Coleman

Business

26 January, 19:06

Dmitri has insurance with Hysterical Coverage Insurance Company, Inc. (Hysterica Coverage). Dmitri has a wreck with Susie. The adjuster for Hysterical Coverage orally agrees to pay Olya $1,000 for the damage to her car. The adjuster, however, gets in trouble with his boss for agreeing to pay too much. He tells Olya that he is backing out of the deal because the agreement is unenforceable on the basis that the statute of frauds requires that a contract to pay the debt of another be in writing. Discuss whether the adjuster is correct or not. In your discussion, you must discuss what constitutes primary versus secondary obligations and which of these obligations is within the Statute of Frauds

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Jolie Dominguez · Answer 1

For this situation agent isn't right in any way. The back up plan should acknowledged the essential duty to pay for all the harms that are brought about by the Dmitri. As this isn't an instance of misrepresentation as the safety net provider would consent to pay on the behalf of Dmitri on the off chance that he failed to pay.