Ask Question
21 June, 15:08

Tell, an Ohio real estate broker, misrepresented to Allen that Tell was licensed in Michigan under Michigan's statute regulating real estate brokers. Allen signed a standard form listing contract agreeing to pay Tell a 6% commission for selling Allen's home in Michigan. Tell sold Allen's home. Under the circumstances, Allen is

A. Not liable to Tell for any amount because Tell violated the Michigan licensing requirements.

B. Liable to Tell only for the value of services rendered under a quasi-contract theory.

C. Not liable to Tell for any amount because Allen signed a standard form contract.

D. Liable to Tell for the full commission under a promissory estoppel theory.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 21 June, 15:12
    0
    I think the answer is B liable to tell only for the value of services rendered under a quasi-contract theory
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Tell, an Ohio real estate broker, misrepresented to Allen that Tell was licensed in Michigan under Michigan's statute regulating real ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers