Ask Question
4 July, 12:39

A. if you found a stock with a zero historical beta and held it as the only stock in your portfolio, you would by definition have a riskless portfolio.

b. the beta of a portfolio of stocks is always larger than the betas of any of the individual stocks.

c. the beta of a portfolio of stocks is always smaller than the betas of any of the individual stocks.

d. it is theoretically possible for a stock to have a beta of 1.0. if a stock did have a beta of 1.0, then, at least in theory, its required rate of return would be equal to the risk-free (default-free) rate of return, rrf.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 4 July, 12:44
    0
    Answer is c. the beta of a portfolio of stocks is always smaller than the betas of any of the individual stocks.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A. if you found a stock with a zero historical beta and held it as the only stock in your portfolio, you would by definition have a ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers