Ask Question
29 November, 11:40

You operate the Student Chef Restaurant. An irate client called. She had previously asked you to cater an event tonight and you agreed. Then things got hectic for you, so you asked your friend Wolfgang, who runs another restaurant similar to yours, to cater the event. Apparently he was a no-show. Which statement is FALSE? A. If Student Chef delegates the duty to perform to Wolfgang, and Wolfgang fails to perform, then Student Chef is not liable because the duty can be delegated. B. If the client agrees to excuse Student Chef Restaurant from the contract and to substitute Wolfgang, such an agreement is called a novation and relieves Student Chef from liability should Wolfgang fail to perform. C. Student Chef's right to receive payment from the client is assignable. D. It is possible that Student Chef's duty to perform may be delegated since it is a task that may be done in a workmanlike manner.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 29 November, 11:43
    0
    C. Student Chef's right to receive payment from the client is assignable.

    Explanation:

    When something is delegated and the contractor agrees, all the responsabilities ansd payments goes to the company that the task got delegated to.

    In this case, if Wolfgang fails its task is full responsability on him because the task was already delegated to him, such as the payments. In consequence, Student Chef's right to receive payment from the client is no longer viable.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “You operate the Student Chef Restaurant. An irate client called. She had previously asked you to cater an event tonight and you agreed. ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers