It may be argued that Japan's explicit promotion of its microchip industry was an excellent example of successful industrial policy. What criteria would you apply to determine whether such a policy is or is not successful? Judging from your own stated criteria, was Japan's exercise successful? Why or why not? What information

Countries by and large use export appropriations to build up their specific industry particularly the one where they believe they have a similar favourable position. The instance of Japan is the same since it likewise utilized appropriations to its recently created microchip industry which was not being grown anyplace else on the planet. A specific mechanical approach is a fruitful when the modern development is expanded and the business generally turns into a develop one because of exchange and rivalry.

Another important condition for the mechanical arrangement to be effective is that the business can create benefits in the territory in which the nation has a relative bit of leeway. Japan experienced development of its microchip industry so the primary condition was satisfied however the last condition was not on the grounds that different nations on the planet began utilizing microchip as a ware that drastically marked down its cost and expanded rivalry so the endeavour stayed a low benefit one. This suggests the legislature must have adequate data about the Industry that it will build the benefit of the segment wherein the nation has a relative favourable position.