Suppose that jack and sophia and hal enter to close on the business without the non-competition agreement. jack states that he would probably sign the non-competition agreement if they included an extra $100,000. a month later, hal and sophia bring jack $100,000. what is the result?

The conditions here exposed need to meet some other requiremtns. For example that Jack decided to sell some property, like frozen food and by that violating the non-competition agreement. Of course that would happen if Hal and Sophia agree to pay the extra 100.000. If Hal and sophia have not paid by the time Jack sues them then HAl and sophia would win because Jack had already had an existing legal duty for him not to compete with them.