Ask Question
10 June, 18:51

According to the article, why is it that once witnesses state information as a fact or identify a person as the perpetrator, the witnesses are usually unwilling or unable to change their understanding of the situation, even after they are provided proof that their account is inaccurate? based on what you learned in the article, explain why jurors should consider eyewitness testimonies carefully during a trial. (site 2)

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 10 June, 18:57
    0
    they are not ready to change their mind or ready to accept the fault even an evidence is shown. inclusion of wrong clue will alter their perception and made them as fake eye witness. so the jurors should consider eyewitness testimonies carefully during a trial.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “According to the article, why is it that once witnesses state information as a fact or identify a person as the perpetrator, the witnesses ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers