Ask Question
29 December, 19:22

Suppose that an issuing bank pays on documents that are conforming to the requirements of the letter of credit, but the seller has shipped worthless goods to the buyer. Which of the following statements, if any, are true?

a. As long as the documents strickly comply with the letter of credit requirements, the bank will not have to reimburse the buyer

b. If there is fraud in the transaction, the bank will have to reinburse the buyer and seek its remedies against the seller

c. The strick compliance insulates the bank from liability, since it assures the bank that the underlying contract between the buyer and seller is entirely independent from the letter of credit contract

d. A and B

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 29 December, 19:45
    0
    the answer C

    Explanation:

    As long as the documents strickly comply with the letter of credit requirements, the bank will not have to reimburse the buyer

    b. If there is fraud in the transaction, the bank will have to reinburse the buyer and seek its remedies against the seller

    c. The strick compliance insulates the bank from liability, since it assures the bank that the underlying contract between the buyer and seller is entirely independent from the letter of credit contract
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Suppose that an issuing bank pays on documents that are conforming to the requirements of the letter of credit, but the seller has shipped ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers