The plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident caused entirely by the defendant. The plaintiff was not wearing his seat belt. He was thrown from his jeep and sustained a compression type injury to the lower back when he landed on the pavement. The defendant offered evidence that had the plaintiff been wearing his seat belt, e would not have been thrown from the jeep. If the doctrine of comparative fault if followed, will his fact reduce the damages to which the plaintiff is entitled? Why?
+4
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident caused entirely by the defendant. The plaintiff was not wearing his seat belt. He was ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Home » Business » The plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident caused entirely by the defendant. The plaintiff was not wearing his seat belt. He was thrown from his jeep and sustained a compression type injury to the lower back when he landed on the pavement.