Ask Question
24 December, 00:31

A congress woman from a state with several ball-bearing factories explains that it is necessary to impose trade restrictions, such as a tariff, on the ball-bearing industry to protect workers in the domestic ball-bearing industry. The congress woman claims that without trade protection, there will be layoffs, causing many U. S. workers in the ball-bearing industry to become unemployed. Which of the following Justifications is the president using to argue for the trade restriction on ball bearings? a. Unfair-competition argument b. Infant-industry argument c. Jobs argument d. National-security argument e. Using-protection-as-a-bargaining-chip argument

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 24 December, 00:52
    0
    C. Jobs argument

    Explanation:

    The job preservation argument is brought up by unions to look out for union jobs.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A congress woman from a state with several ball-bearing factories explains that it is necessary to impose trade restrictions, such as a ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers