Ask Question
4 August, 19:51

A country rejects FDI proposals in certain industries. It does so because the tangible advantages of such investments are lesser than potential costs like loss of employment and reduction of overall well-being. However, it aggressively pursues inviting foreign investments in sectors like infrastructure, education, and health care because of the benefits that accrue with them. Which political view of FDI is discussed in this example

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 4 August, 20:09
    0
    Complete question:

    A country rejects FDI proposals in certain industries. It does so because the tangible advantages of such investments are lesser than potential costs like loss of employment and reduction of overall well-being. However, it aggressively pursues inviting foreign investments in sectors like infrastructure, education, and health care because of the benefits that accrue with them. Which political view of FDI is discussed in this example

    a. The pure market view

    b. The free market view

    c. The radical view

    d. The pragmatic nationalist view

    Answer:

    The pragmatic nationalist view is discussed in this example

    Explanation:

    Pragmatic nationalist views are that FDI has advantages, including capital inflow, technology, skills and employment, as well as costs, such as return of income to the country of origin and a negative impact on balance of payments.

    FDI has both advantages and drawbacks, the realistic nationalist view is. In that view, FDI should also be allowed as long as the advantages are greater than the costs.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A country rejects FDI proposals in certain industries. It does so because the tangible advantages of such investments are lesser than ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers