Silics Inc., a software firm, decided to hire a technical expert. The company conducted an aptitude test followed by structured interviews for candidates. David, an African American, did exceptionally well in all the assessments, but Silics Inc., known for discriminating against African Americans, rejected him. David then filed a case against Silics Inc. on charges of racial discrimination. In the context of affirmative action, the company will most likely be required to:

Question

Kelton Rocha

Business

3 September, 15:07

Silics Inc., a software firm, decided to hire a technical expert. The company conducted an aptitude test followed by structured interviews for candidates. David, an African American, did exceptionally well in all the assessments, but Silics Inc., known for discriminating against African Americans, rejected him. David then filed a case against Silics Inc. on charges of racial discrimination. In the context of affirmative action, the company will most likely be required to:

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Tanner Fischer · Answer 1

D) pay attorney's fees and court costs for David.

Explanation:

This is something the company would only start with when it comes to affirmative action. It is essential to cover David's court costs, as he is the discriminated party in this case.

Afterward, the company would most probably give David a job offer, reflecting on his exceptional assessment.

Since this is an individual case (only David has sued the company), this will not affect other minorities already working in the company.