Ask Question
12 February, 14:44

he Nash Inc., a manufacturer of low-sugar, low-sodium, low-cholesterol TV dinners, would like to increase its market share in the Sunbelt. In order to do so, Nash has decided to locate a new factory in the Panama City area. Nash will either buy or lease a site depending upon which is more advantageous. The site location committee has narrowed down the available sites to the following three very similar buildings that will meet their needs. Building A: Purchase for a cash price of $610,000, useful life 27 years. Building B: Lease for 27 years with annual lease payments of $71,570 being made at the beginning of the year. Building C: Purchase for $650,800 cash. This building is larger than needed; however, the excess space can be sublet for 27 years at a net annual rental of $6,890. Rental payments will be received at the end of each year. The Nash Inc. has no aversion to being a landlord.'

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 12 February, 14:52
    0
    Check the explanation

    Explanation:

    Present value of Building A = Cash price of Building = $610,000

    Present value of Building B = $70,000 * Cumulative PV Factor at 12% for 25 periods of annuity due

    = $70,000 * 8.78432 = $614,902

    Present value of Building C = Cash price - Present value of rental income = $650,000 - $6,000 * Cumulative PV Factor at 12% for 25 periods

    = $650,000 - $6,000 * 7.84314 = $602,941

    The flounder Inc. should locate itself in Building C.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “he Nash Inc., a manufacturer of low-sugar, low-sodium, low-cholesterol TV dinners, would like to increase its market share in the Sunbelt. ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers