A scientific paper that has passed through the peer review process is more respected than one that has not. Why might a scientist value a peer-reviewed paper? A. The analysis of the experimental results is guaranteed to be entertaining. B. The described experiment meets or exceeds the standards of good science. C. The scientist who wrote the paper is likely to become a famous person. D. The described materials are expected to become a good investment.

Question

Annabella Paul

Business

31 July, 11:26

A scientific paper that has passed through the peer review process is more respected than one that has not. Why might a scientist value a peer-reviewed paper? A. The analysis of the experimental results is guaranteed to be entertaining. B. The described experiment meets or exceeds the standards of good science. C. The scientist who wrote the paper is likely to become a famous person. D. The described materials are expected to become a good investment.

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Keaton · Answer 1

B) The described experiment meets or exceeds the standards of good science.

Explanation:

When we say a scientific report that has been peer-reviewed, it means that it has been read and evaluated by other scientists. The peer-review process is meant to ensure the integrity and quality of the scientific publications. The peer reviewer should review the experimental design, the data and the analysis.