Aime goes to the supermarket to buy lotion. She always buys the same brand, so she knows exactly what the bottle looks like. Jaime is in a hurry, so she grabs what she thinks is her usual lotion and checks out. When she returns home, she notices that the brand name of the lotion is different from her usual one and in fact realizes she has purchased a "no-name" brand that looks like her usual brand. Which federal law has the no-name brand manufacturer most likely violated? Group of answer choices

a. Clayton Act

b. Lanham Act

c. Sherman Anti-Trust Act

d. Robinson-Patman Act

e. Consumer Protection Regulatory Act

Question

Guest

Business

15 July, 05:26

Aime goes to the supermarket to buy lotion. She always buys the same brand, so she knows exactly what the bottle looks like. Jaime is in a hurry, so she grabs what she thinks is her usual lotion and checks out. When she returns home, she notices that the brand name of the lotion is different from her usual one and in fact realizes she has purchased a "no-name" brand that looks like her usual brand. Which federal law has the no-name brand manufacturer most likely violated? Group of answer choices

a. Clayton Act

b. Lanham Act

c. Sherman Anti-Trust Act

d. Robinson-Patman Act

e. Consumer Protection Regulatory Act

+4

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Alina Little · Answer 1

b. Lanham Act

Explanation:

Lanham Act -

According to this act,

It governs the unfair competition, service marks and trademarks, is referred to as the Lanham Act.

Where Trademark, refers to the some symbol, logo, phrase or word, which act as an identity of the goods or services, and make the product to stand out from rest of the product.

Copying the same trademark is an illegal activity.

The Law was passed by Congress in year 1946.

It is also called the Trademark Act 1946.

Hence, from the given scenario of the question,

The correct option is b. Lanham Act.